This timely report on the question of affordable housing vs. density comes from the California Dept. of Housing & Community Development and mirrors the situation in the region surrounding Arlington MA.
Housing production has not kept up with job and household growth. The location and type of new housing does not meet the needs of many new house- holds. As a result, only one in five households can afford a typical home, overcrowding doubled in the 1990’s, and too many households pay more than they can afford for their housing.
High-density housing is affordable housing; affordable
housing is high-density housing.
Not all high density housing is affordable to low-income families.
High-density and affordable housing will cause too much traffic.
People who live in affordable housing own fewer cars and
High-density development strains public services and
Compact development offers greater efficiency in use of
public services and infrastructure.
People who live in high-density and affordable housing
won’t fit into my neighborhood.
People who need affordable housing already live and work
in your community.
Affordable housing reduces property values.
No study in California has ever shown that affordable
housing developments reduce property values.
Residents of affordable housing move too often to be stable
When rents are guaranteed to remain stable, tenants
move less often.
High-density and affordable housing undermine community
New affordable and high-density housing can always be
designed to fit into existing communities.
High-density and affordable housing increase crime.
The design and use of public spaces has a far more
significant affect on crime than density or income levels.
See an example of a “case study” of two affordable housing developments in Irvine CA, San Marcos at 64 units per acre.
San Paulo at 25 units per acre.
Both are designed to blend with nearby homes.